Hiring was already difficult
Of employers globally reported difficulty finding the talent they needed in 2022.
ManpowerGroup — Q3 2022 ↗Turn candidate walkthroughs and agentic builds into role-specific evidence: demonstrated skills, gaps, and the questions worth asking. Recruiters and subject-matter experts keep the judgment. The sifting disappears.
Claim: “Led enterprise escalations and cut churn 18%.”
“We pulled the top twenty accounts into a weekly review. I owned the three loudest personally — churn fell from 31% to 13% over two quarters.”Transcript excerpt · claim matches stated metric · rubric: ownership, de-escalation
Claim: “Aligned product and sales on a new pricing rollout.”
Missing signal — no example of resolving disagreement. Follow-up: “Tell us about a pricing decision product pushed back on.”
Of employers globally reported difficulty finding the talent they needed in 2022.
ManpowerGroup — Q3 2022 ↗Applications per recruiter in 2024 compared with 2021, within Gem's recruiting dataset.
Gem — 2025 Recruiting Benchmarks ↗Of hiring managers said the application surge—including AI-generated or enhanced submissions—made candidate skills harder to verify.
Robert Half — March 2026 release ↗of U.S. HR leaders said reviewing AI-generated applications slowed hiring. Robert Half survey — conducted November 2025, published March 2026 ↗
Vanyrion connects candidate claims to cited responses, artifacts, and tested outcomes—giving hiring teams evidence before the interview.
General-purpose video screening for any role. Live agentic builds when software roles need executable proof. Both feed the same evidence report your hiring team can inspect.
No magic score. A defined chain runs under both products—and you can inspect every link in it.
Findings are model interpretation of submitted evidence, always cited back to the exact response moment. A video alone cannot establish authorship or production competence—so The Reflection reports what the response demonstrates and flags what only a deeper check can settle.
Behaviour is tested against versioned assertions. Re-grading the same stored trace with the same grader reproduces the same verdict. New agent runs can vary—so they're compared within the same frozen contract, never across shifting goalposts.
Run one role through Vanyrion against your current baseline. Our target: cut time-to-shortlist by 50% while raising qualified-candidate yield. A pilot holds us to it, measured by:
More genuinely qualified candidates per 100 applicants—volume you can act on, not noise to filter.
Convert shortlists at a higher rate, without narrowing the diversity of who reaches the room.
Fewer strong candidates discarded before a human conversation—the cost old funnels never measured.
Less recruiter and hiring-manager hours burned per accepted offer, with evidence doing the pre-work.
More applicants finish the evaluation—and unexplained drop-off trends toward zero.
Six- and twelve-month performance signals improve as the evidence loop compounds. Auditable end to end.
A normalized, ATS-agnostic hiring result—role fit, evidence, artifacts and recommended follow-ups—delivered via API and signed webhooks.
Bring one role and your current baseline. We'll run a pilot and show you the evidence reports before you decide anything.
Email the founders — hello@vanyrion.aiRecruiters and subject-matter experts keep the judgment. We carry the sifting.