Verification-first hiring

Know what candidates can actually do.

Turn candidate walkthroughs and agentic builds into role-specific evidence: demonstrated skills, gaps, and the questions worth asking. Recruiters and subject-matter experts keep the judgment. The sifting disappears.

Sample assessment
Illustrative · Customer Success Lead
✓
De-escalation under pressure

Claim: “Led enterprise escalations and cut churn 18%.”

Open cited evidence · 02:14–02:58
“We pulled the top twenty accounts into a weekly review. I owned the three loudest personally — churn fell from 31% to 13% over two quarters.”
Transcript excerpt · claim matches stated metric · rubric: ownership, de-escalation
Strong
?
Cross-functional influence

Claim: “Aligned product and sales on a new pricing rollout.”

Missing signal — no example of resolving disagreement. Follow-up: “Tell us about a pricing decision product pushed back on.”

Probe
Recruiter decision
01 — The hiring problem

Recruiting was already hard.
AI added a verification problem.

Self-reported survey · global employers 75%

Hiring was already difficult

Of employers globally reported difficulty finding the talent they needed in 2022.

ManpowerGroup — Q3 2022 ↗
Self-reported survey · hiring managers 65%

AI makes verification harder

Of hiring managers said the application surge—including AI-generated or enhanced submissions—made candidate skills harder to verify.

Robert Half — March 2026 release ↗
67%

of U.S. HR leaders said reviewing AI-generated applications slowed hiring. Robert Half survey — conducted November 2025, published March 2026 ↗

Vanyrion connects candidate claims to cited responses, artifacts, and tested outcomes—giving hiring teams evidence before the interview.

02 — The product

Two ways to gather evidence.
One inspectable report.

General-purpose video screening for any role. Live agentic builds when software roles need executable proof. Both feed the same evidence report your hiring team can inspect.

03 — How evaluation works

From rubric to verdict,
every step inspectable.

No magic score. A defined chain runs under both products—and you can inspect every link in it.

01Role rubricBuilt from your JD and hiring-team expectations
→
02Candidate evidenceGuided walkthrough or agentic build
→
03EvaluationAgainst the rubric—cited, never opaque
→
04Inspectable reportEvidence, gaps, follow-ups—auditable
The Reflection — interpretation, grounded

Honest about what a video can prove

Findings are model interpretation of submitted evidence, always cited back to the exact response moment. A video alone cannot establish authorship or production competence—so The Reflection reports what the response demonstrates and flags what only a deeper check can settle.

The Terminal — executable, versioned

Reproducible where it matters

Behaviour is tested against versioned assertions. Re-grading the same stored trace with the same grader reproduces the same verdict. New agent runs can vary—so they're compared within the same frozen contract, never across shifting goalposts.

04 — What a pilot will measure

Quality, not
just automation.

Run one role through Vanyrion against your current baseline. Our target: cut time-to-shortlist by 50% while raising qualified-candidate yield. A pilot holds us to it, measured by:

↑

Qualified-candidate yield

More genuinely qualified candidates per 100 applicants—volume you can act on, not noise to filter.

↑

Interview-to-offer conversion

Convert shortlists at a higher rate, without narrowing the diversity of who reaches the room.

↓

False-negative rate

Fewer strong candidates discarded before a human conversation—the cost old funnels never measured.

↓

Hiring-team time per offer

Less recruiter and hiring-manager hours burned per accepted offer, with evidence doing the pre-work.

↑

Candidate completion

More applicants finish the evaluation—and unexplained drop-off trends toward zero.

↑

Quality of hire

Six- and twelve-month performance signals improve as the evidence loop compounds. Auditable end to end.

05 — Built into your stack

Results that flow
into the tools you use.

A normalized, ATS-agnostic hiring result—role fit, evidence, artifacts and recommended follow-ups—delivered via API and signed webhooks.

GreenhousePlanned
LeverPlanned
AshbyIn discussion
WorkdayRoadmap
REST + webhooksAvailable
Internal toolsAdapter SDK · planned

One role. Two weeks.
A measured answer.

Bring one role and your current baseline. We'll run a pilot and show you the evidence reports before you decide anything.

Email the founders — hello@vanyrion.ai

Recruiters and subject-matter experts keep the judgment. We carry the sifting.